Go Back   Plastic Surgery user forums > Plastic Surgery News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Plastic Surgery News Latest Plastic Surgery News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 06:22 PM
News Feeder14 News Feeder14 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,758
My Photos: (0)
Default Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention during uninterr

Research published early online in the European Heart Journal suggests that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe even if performed during uninterrupted anticoagulation (UAC).

According to the researchers, a common consensus is to postpone PCI until international normalised ratio (INR) levels of < 1.5–1.8 are reached. Therefore, the safety and efficacy of various periprocedural antithrombotic strategies in patients on long-term oral anticoagulation with warfarin was investigated.
The study involved a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients (n=523) on warfarin therapy referred for PCI in four centres with a policy to interrupt anticoagulation (IAC) before PCI and in three centres with UAC during PCI.
Major bleeding, access-site complications, and major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularisation, and stent thrombosis) were recorded during hospitalisation. A total of 241 patients underwent PCI without pauses in warfarin therapy (the UAC group; mean INR = 2.2), and in 254 patients (IAC group), oral anticoagulation treatment with warfarin was stopped before the procedure (mean 3.0 days, range 1–30 days). Furthermore, a total of 28 patients underwent PCI when warfarin treatment was interrupted on the day of the index procedure.

The following results were reported:
• Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP) inhibitors (P < 0.001) and low-molecular-weight heparins (P < 0.001) were more often used in the IAC group.
• Major bleeding and access-site complications were more common in the IAC group (5.0% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.02 and 11.3% vs. 5.0%, P = 0.01, respectively) than in the UAC group.
• After adjusting for propensity score, the group difference in access-site complications remained significant [OR (odds ratio) 2.8, 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.3–6.1, P = 0.008], but did not remain significant in major bleeding (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.0–15.3, P = 0.05).
More...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
© 2007 Immercivemedical Inc. All rights reserved.